Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/Today

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

See Wikipedia:Categories for deletion policies for the official rules of this page, and how to do cleanup.

Deletion of a category may mean that the articles and images in it are directly put in its parent category, or that another subdivision of the parent category is made. If they are already members of more suitable categories, it may also mean that they become a member of one category less.

How to use this page

[edit]
  1. Know if the category you are looking at needs deleting (or to be created). If it is a "red link" and has no articles or subcategories, then it is already deleted (more likely, it was never really created in the first place), and does not need to be listed here.
  2. Read and understand Wikipedia:Categorization before using this page. Nominate categories that violate policies here, or are misspelled, mis-capitalized, redundant/need to be merged, not NPOV, small without potential for growth, or are generally bad ideas. (See also Wikipedia:Naming conventions and Wikipedia:Manual of Style.)
  3. Please read the Wikipedia:Categorization of people policy if nominating or voting on a people-related category.
  4. Unless the category to be deleted is non-controversial – vandalism or a duplicate, for example – please do not depopulate the category (remove the tags from articles) before the community has made a decision.
  5. Add {{cfd}} to the category page for deletion. (If you are recommending that the category be renamed, you may also add a note giving the suggested new name.) This will add a message to it, and also put the page you are nominating into Category:Categories for deletion. It's important to do this to help alert people who are watching or browsing the category.
    1. Alternately, use the rename template like this: {{cfr|newname}}
    2. If you are concerned with a stub category, make sure to inform the WikiProject Stub sorting
  6. Add new deletion candidates under the appropriate day near the top of this page.
    1. Alternatively, if the category is a candidate for speedy renaming (see Wikipedia:Category renaming), add it to the speedy category at the bottom.
  7. Make sure you add a colon (:) in the link to the category being listed, like [[:Category:Foo]]. This makes the category link a hard link which can be seen on the page (and avoids putting this page into the category you are nominating).
  8. Sign any listing or vote you make by typing ~~~~ after your text.
  9. Link both categories to delete and categories to merge into. Failure to do this will delay consideration of your suggestion.

Special notes

[edit]

Some categories may be listed in Category:Categories for deletion but accidently not listed here.

Discussion for Today

[edit]
This page is transcluded from Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025_March_19


March 19

[edit]

NEW NOMINATIONS

[edit]

Category:Uruguayan immigrants to Venezuela

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Mistake, recently created category. NoonIcarus (talk) 09:15, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Çine

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Category with just one entry. Also propose merging-

All categories with just one entry. Lost in Quebec (talk) 09:06, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:20th-century Greek Americans

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: merge, presumably the scope of the two categories is the same. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:29, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Canadian actors by province or territory and populated place

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: All contain 1-3 subcategories each. Not useful for navigation. Merge per WP:NARROW. –Aidan721 (talk) 05:10, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nominator.Lost in Quebec (talk) 09:45, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sportspeople by populated place in Canada by province or territory

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: All contain 1-3 subcategories each. Not useful for navigation. Merge per WP:NARROW. –Aidan721 (talk) 05:07, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:German actors by state and populated place

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Redundant category layer. Merge per WP:NARROW and previous discussion. –Aidan721 (talk) 04:56, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welsh actresses by populated place

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: All contain 2-3 subcategories each. Not useful for navigation. Merge per WP:NARROW. Don't need to merge to a second target since the subcategories are already in the "by county" tree. –Aidan721 (talk) 04:39, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scottish comedy actors

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_January_4#Comedy_actors SMasonGarrison 04:21, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scottish actors by council area and populated place

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: All contain 1-2 subcategories each. Not useful for navigation. Merge per WP:NARROW and recent precedents. –Aidan721 (talk) 04:16, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

English actors by county and populated place

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: All contain 1-3 subcategories each. Not useful for navigation. Merge per WP:NARROW and recent precedents. –Aidan721 (talk) 04:06, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actors by nationality and populated place

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: All contain 1-3 "Actors from FOO" subcategories. Not useful for navigation. Merge per WP:NARROW and recent precedents. –Aidan721 (talk) 03:44, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Former forts

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: This is an underpopulated category that, if populated (after a lot of work), would be huge and unwieldy, even if the (in fact ambiguous) qualifier "completely demolished" is kept. I suggest populating "Military installations closed in [year or appropriate time frame]" as sufficient, or an alternative, as the case may be. btw I think the subcategory "Former star forts" is distinctive enough for keeping, though each should be cross-categorized in "Military installations closed in [year or appropriate time frame]". Doprendek (talk) 21:24, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (d) 03:34, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:20th-century American people by ethnicity

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Isolated category with four subcategories. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 03:23, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Plant characters

[edit]
Merge Category:Plant characters into Category:Anthropomorphic plants
Reason: These categories both seem to cover the exact same concept of anthropomorphized plant characters as far as I can see. I think most of us can agree that one of them is redundant to the other. AHI-3000 (talk) 18:53, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus on merge direction
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (d) 03:14, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kozhikode

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Likely made-up arbitrary divisions; contents are mostly suburbs, but there are a few universities and colleges interspersed. They are miscapitalized, and I've nominated the associated articles Kozhikode East, Kozhikode North, and Kozhikode South for deletion. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 03:12, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Historians by nationality and populated place

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one country in here SMasonGarrison 02:58, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge I'd suggest merging the subcategory as well, as it contains only two subcategories. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 03:39, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Publishers from Brooklyn

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: We really don't need to diffuse publishers by populated place. We don't even diffuse by state. SMasonGarrison 02:45, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. We should diffuse publishers by city because many citation formats actually require the location of a publisher as a reference citation practice. It makes sense to categorize them by location.4meter4 (talk) 02:48, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:F0 and F1 tornadoes

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Per CFD nominations for the sibling categories. Possibly also split to levels 0 and 1. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 02:09, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]